1. Why do you have a valid xhtml 1.0 link in the footer when it isn't even close to be so?
2. Why do you have a valid css link in the footer when it isn't even close to be so?
Just wondering, thats all.
Those are added by the standard SMF template. I can only assume that pure SMF passes the tests. The TD stuff was added to the templates and the TD banner/menu doesn't pass the tests.
Ultimately it will nice to clean them up but we haven't taken the time to do it.
Bruce
I just wanted to do a post, hehe :P. But hey nice to hear that :)